Rules Procedures

Download A Life and Death Decision: A Jury Weighs the Death Penalty by Scott E. Sundby PDF

By Scott E. Sundby

With a existence within the stability, a jury convicts a guy of homicide and now has to determine even if he may be positioned to dying. Twelve humans now face a momentous choice.
Bringing drama to existence, A lifestyles and demise determination supplies special perception into how a jury deliberates. We suppose the passions, anger, and melancholy because the jurors grapple with felony, ethical, and private dilemmas. The jurors' voices are compelling. From the idealist to the "holdout," the person stories―of how and why they voted for all times or death―drive the narrative. The reader is correct there siding with one or one other juror during this riveting read.
From videos to novels to tv, juries fascinate. targeting a unmarried case, Sundby sheds mild on broader matters, together with the jobs of race, type, and gender within the justice method. With loss of life penalty situations always within the information, this can be a big window on how genuine jurors planned a couple of urgent nationwide issue.

Show description

Read or Download A Life and Death Decision: A Jury Weighs the Death Penalty PDF

Similar rules & procedures books

Justifying Private Law Remedies

In August 2006, the 3rd Australian responsibilities convention used to be hosted in Brisbane by way of the TC Beirne college of legislation. The topic of the convention used to be "Justifying deepest legislation treatments. " This ebook encompasses a variety of the papers introduced at that convention, provided below a number of different types, facing the elemental factor of justification — basic options, functionality, repayment, punishment, and restitution and disgorgement.

Popular Participation in Japanese Criminal Justice: From Jurors to Lay Judges

This publication analyses the combined courts and lay judges within the jap felony justice procedure. It takes a specific specialise in the hugely public begin of the combined courtroom, the saiban-in approach, and the jury process among 1928-1943. This was once the 1st time jap voters participated as choice makers in legal legislations.

Extra resources for A Life and Death Decision: A Jury Weighs the Death Penalty

Example text

I mean, because you were asked, if this person killed beyond a shadow of a doubt, could you give this person the death penalty? ’ It gave her pause for thought. I don’t think in all candor that she was completely honest when she had said she could give death. ” This tack reopened the dialogue with Peggy. Rather than arguing to her that she was mistaken in her emotional and moral belief that Lane did not deserve the death penalty, it suggested that, however hard it might be, she had to set those feelings aside because they welled up from an illegitimate source: her inability to follow the law and actually sentence someone to death.

It droppeth as the gentle rain from heaven [u]pon the place beneath. . ”9 The criminal justice system’s challenge is translating Shakespeare’s wonderful poetic phrase—“when mercy seasons justice”—from iambic pentameter into workable legal doctrine that can be used in the courtroom and applied by the sentencer. ” The Court has held that the Eighth Amendment embodies a principle of “individualized consideration,” a principle that requires that before a sentence of death can be imposed, the jury must first consider a defendant’s individual circumstances.

The final witnesses in the mitigation phase were several prison guards who testified that Steven had been a good prisoner during his various periods of incarceration and that he had been given positions of trust as a prisoner. The defense even introduced a letter from a civilian who explained that Steven had come to his assistance a number of years earlier when Steven had been on a prison work detail. “Good prison behavior” testimony by prison guards usually is highly persuasive with jurors. Because the only alternative to a death sentence is life without parole, such testimony can assure the jury that, if it chooses life, the defendant will not pose any future danger and may even make some positive contributions if allowed to live.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.10 of 5 – based on 17 votes